Net neutrality can kill investment in broadband, according to a must-read commentary by Financial Post editor Terence Corcoran.

He says that what we need is more investment in broadband, not more rules that inhibit capital spending.

The CRTC got this right the first time. Moving now to force Bell and the other firms to shape their businesses to meet the demands of people who want a piece of the action or who have fantasy views of the Internet as a public utility can only divert industry attention and resources away from market solutions and efficient development of new broadband services to reduce congestion.

He uses a swimming pool metaphor, perhaps in hopes of more summer-like weather.

Read the full column.

Just days after Bell Aliant announced fibre to the home in the two largest communities in New Brunswick, Rogers released word of two innovations for its customers.

First, Rogers is launching an N-series wireless router, integrated into its new DOCSIS 3.0 modems. It becomes the first company in North America to offer this device.

Secondly, Rogers announced that beginning next month, it will be offering a 50Mbps service, initially in the greater Toronto area, but getting rolled out further.

With Canada’s three major cable companies offering speeds of 50Mbps and more, the pressure is on the telephone companies to respond.

The CRTC hearing into internet traffic management practices was asked a number of times to presume that ISPs would break the law. The independent film producers led off the discussions on Wednesday complaining that throttling of Torrent traffic discriminates against their low-cost content delivery system.

An example was given of an low-budget documentary recorded by an independent and made available by BitTorrent having to compete against a big-budget, high-def production that does a deal with iTunes for distribution. The allegation was that ISPs throttling Torrents are discriminating against the independent producers who couldn’t strike a deal for iTunes distribution.

One of the commenters on the National Post live blog raised an insightful point: are the ISPs discriminating or is it iTunes that is practicing discrimination? The ISPs don’t care if it is a big budget production house (such as the experience of CBC’s Next Great Prime Minister program) or an amateur video of dogs dancing.

The traffic management isn’t discriminating between legal and pirated material.

Where is the discrimination?

On Monday, at the CRTC’s network management proceedings, Juniper raised the idea of users defining which applications they want to receive priority in times of congestion. Some follow-up discussions on Tuesday indicated an interest from other parties in this area.

But many reports glossed over the concept that only some of the network management could be achieved in this manner, not all.

For applications that consume all of the available bandwidth in a shared network environment, it doesn’t appear to be sufficient for customers to set their own prioritization – the network would still need to reserve an allocation for those customers that don’t share the same focus.

Bell Aliant and the government of New Brunswick have announced plans to fibre the homes of Saint John and Fredericton.

It is a $60M project for 70,000 homes and businesses – roughly $850 per site.

In addition to bringing the most advanced technology to our customers, it makes economic sense for Bell Aliant in these markets because of the cost advantages associated with our virtually 100 per cent aerial (above ground) network infrastructure and low population density.

Bell Aliant is coming out swinging in the competitive battle for selling broadband bundles. How will the cable companies respond?