I was just reading the sometimes deranged rantings in comments on Michael Geist’s blog posting about Net Neutrality and was struck by the juxtaposition of a news item in the upper right corner of his blog:
HACKERS OVERWHELM SOME KEY INTERNET TRAFFIC COMPUTERS
Question: Under Net Neutrality principles, would network operators be allowed to take any interventionist actions to block or slow the hackers’ action? Is hacker content protected content? Who makes that decision?
Or, are ISPs are simply plumbing.
Who is supposed to look after these problems?
Technorati Tags:
net neutrality, Michael Geist