FCC Chair Kevin Martin told Globalcomm delegates on Monday that there is no need for the FCC to intervene further into the issue of Net Neutrality.

Martin is quoted by Marketwatch as saying:

At first, I was skeptical that an email being circulated really did start with Meg Whitman, President and CEO of eBay. Despite references to the email on seemingly credible websites, some of the language in Whitman’s message just didn’t seem to be right. I tend to be concerned that these things start out from the same people who send emails telling you that your pet will die from your household cleaning with a Swiffer [false].

So my antennae are still on alert, but given the presence of an eBay Government Relations website with similar themes, I suspect that Meg has thrown her two-cents on Net Neutrality into the fray.

Powerful words. An empassioned plea to battle the evil empire – the converged cabal of anti-competitive collaboration: apparently, on eBay you can find a partnership between telephone and cable companies.

Looking for a response? Watch for Net Neutrality to be addressed at The Canadian Telecom Summit, next week.

Like the digestive effects of my Superbowl chicken wings, the issue of Net Neutrality just won’t go away [stay tuned next January for my recipe for wings]. And like my wings, I’ll bet you can’t help but come back to this issue for more!

xchange magazine has staked its turf in the battle, and it appears to be more to the right than even I would venture. As part of the magazine’s e-book series, there is a piece of propaganda that confuses Net Neutrality and Fair Use in a free download.

Part of the nature of independence in my consulting is my willingness to take shots at either sides of an issue – awarding darts and laurels where appropriate. There is cause to present both types to each both side of what should be a more serious discussion of a reasonable set of operating rules for compensation for use of private assets that make up the global network.

Apparently, some network operators, looking for a catchy term for their position on the issue of net neutrality have hijacked the term ‘fair use’ from the copyright dialog. As we have written before, the issues are related, so I am somewhat concerned that using ‘fair use’ to refer to the antithesis of net neutrality will do nothing more than add more confusion to an already difficult discussion. Dart to the service providers. Get better marketing and be sure to distance yourselves from this piece in Xchange!

We’ll be hearing more at The Canadian Telecom Summit on this issue.

A number of the newswires, including Yahoo, carried a story this week about a new political party for pedophiles being launched in the Netherlands.

The Charity, Freedom and Diversity (NVD) party said it wanted to cut the legal age for sexual relations to 12 and eventually scrap the limit altogether. According to one of the party founders, Ad Van den Berg:

Gee, maybe they talk to you that way because that kind of behaviour is criminal!

Illegal Content on the Internet is one of the new subjects being discussed at The Canadian Telecom Summit, which opens June 12. Why should illegal content get an exemption at the border? What is the role of internet service providers?

We will be blogging from the Summit and watch for coverage in most of the major papers.

Better still, participate in the discussions and register today!

The 2005 annual report of Canada’s Privacy Commissioner contains a full section on RFID (radio frequency identification) issues, but appears to be silent on location-based cellular services. You could say that the Privacy Commissioner’s fixations with RFID tracking are off-track.

RFID tagging dramatically extends the number of items that may allow our lives and behaviors to be tracked. There are real privacy concerns. But there are many more technologies that should be viewed as clear and present dangers, not the subject of a study to prepare for future world.

For example, the Privacy Commissioner’s RFID fact sheet speaks about situations, such as:

The Airmiles program, as well as many other loyalty programs, know the kind of alchohol I buy, to accompany groceries and pharmaceutical products I purchased. RFID will allow them to know which particular bottle of Spanish Rioja I bought, but the brand and vintage is likely all that is needed to build a profile, not the individual tag. Couple that information with my location and the concerns of the Privacy Commissioner are realized. These are present dangers.

Should the RFID-type guidelines be applicable to my cell phone? Each cell phone has a unique identifier and can be associated with its owner. Rather than dealing with a hypothetical future world that may combine Global Positioning Systems (‘GPS’) with RFID, there are guidelines and rules needed to deal with the existing combinations of mobile GPS and AGPS tracking, data collection and reporting.

We need serious discussions to focus on privacy issues with the current deployment of location based services. It is one thing to track our teenagers when they are out in the family fun-wagon on Saturday evening. But that information means that other people could also access the same data to know where that car is sitting, how fast it is travelling – perhaps issue speeding tickets based on such information.

Add GPS and AGPS to cel phones and we can track where anyone is located and who is assembled with them. There are real issues to be examined, such as: who has the ability to disable tracking; and, should it be able to be turned on remotely to help in search and recovery?

Numerous policy questions arise that need to balance convenient consumer features, commercial services, public safety and personal privacy concerns. These are difficult issues that have implications for technology development.

The Privacy Commissioner has already found that there are limits to her extra-territorial powers – the ability to pursue cases outside of Canada. We need rules for these technologies and privacy solutions that ensure that Canadians are protected from threats, both within and outside our borders.