Limits on Internet free speech

The Toronto Star, among other papers, reports that animal activists have been jailed under US anti-terror laws.

Among other activities, the three had been found guilty of conspiracy and interstate stalking against employees of Huntingdon’s New Jersey operations for urging sympathizers to harass Huntingdon employees, vandalize their cars and publish their names and personal data on the Internet.

Would the same charges, conspiracy and interstate stalking, be relevant protections in cases of Americans engaging in such activities against Canadians?

Meaningful competition

OntarioTELUS has announced that it has been selected to provide the Government of Ontario with managed data services, including network security. The initial 5-year, $150M contract includes opportunities for 5 additional years under extensions.

While TELUS has its own extensive network in Ontario, the contract calls for 2000 circuits in 1500 locations; off-net locations will mainly be handled by Hydro One Telecom. As a result, over the next 9-12 months of implementation, Bell Canada will experience a meaningful erosion in retail revenues, without significant wholesale off-sets.

Just as Bell West gained credibility in its selection as the builders of the Alberta SuperNet, this strategic win helps to further the interests of meaningful competition in Eastern Canada.

There are those who think that the competitive landscape is a cozy duopoly between the cable companies and the phone companies. Make no mistake. This contract not only is evidence of a vigorous rivalry between multiple service providers, it helps advance the state of competition for all subscribers by improving TELUS’ credibility in Bell’s backyard.

Technorati Tags:
, , , ,

Valley vision

I know we are talking about some really small towns (3700 TV subscribers, 150 internet subscribers in 13 communities), but something seems a little off when the phone company buys the cable company. That is what MTS Allstream announced yesterday in purchasing Valley Cable Vision.

Kelvin Shepherd is quoted:

This transaction advances our strategy of being Manitoba’s leading full service provider of wireline, wireless, broadband internet, and television services. We look forward to building on Valley Vision’s strong tradition of serving cable television customers in the Pembina Valley, and being able to offer an expanded suite of communications and entertainment service options that meet their needs.

In the Pembina Valley, MTS Allstream won’t just be the leading full service provider; they’ll be the only service provider in town.

It begs a couple questions. How does creation of a single monopoly provider help customers? How does operating a small cable company benefit shareholders of a national telco? I would like to hear the story behind acquisition.

Technorati Tags:
, , , , ,

Disruptive purchasing

I had a note from a reader who tells me that he has an interesting way to get his communications services.

He took advantage of a Rogers sign-up bonus to get 6 months of free phone service. However, he uses BitTorrent and he wasn’t crazy about the impact of ‘traffic shaping’ from Rogers, so he uses naked-DSL Sympatico for his high-speed internet – no local telephone service over the loop.

I understand that most of the strange combinations like this are put together by competitive analysts from one company checking out the deals and services from the other. This person is just a plain, ordinary consumer.

It is unusual, but it is evidence that some people will arbitrage deals and aren’t as concerned about bundles – unless there are tangible savings. Any others out there?

Technorati Tags:
, , , ,

TELUS income trust

TELUS has announced its plan to reorganize itself, in its entirety, as an income trust.

There will be many who will analyse the valuations, the tax implications, the costs, etc. For now, I will note that TELUS has distinguished itself in that it isn’t reorganizing its operations, spinning out parts of the company, departments, geographies; the entire company will fall under this structure.

Their objective is clear – put shareholders in control of their tax planning. I have commented before that I don’t like energy expended on income trusts when the government could eliminate the advantages in its next budget. Bringing the entire company under the income trust structure may give TELUS the best of both worlds. Let Bob McFarlane’s finance folks work on optimal finance structures, while the rest of the company does what makes sense operationally.


Update:
Red faced award has to go to Morgan Stanley that issued a downgrade just last Friday, missing today’s run up of almost 15% (more than 15% at the peak). Ouch.

Scroll to Top