More fibre in Verizon’s diet

Globe and MailCatherine McLean had an article in Saturday’s Globe and Mail about the Verizon FiOS gamble, betting the company on fibre to the home (FTTH), as contrasted with the approach of most other telcos to build fibre to the node (FTTN) and use traditional copper wiring to enter the home.

While Bell Canada has its own satellite service to deliver TV, there is still a race for interactive service speeds. With Videotron’s 100Mbps service trial announced this week, the telcos are racing to catch up to the cable companies.

So far, Verizon is the only major North American carrier to commit to as high a fibre content in its diet – uniquely positioning it to surpass the cable speeds demonstrated last week by Videotron. Do the capital markets have the appetite to fund any others?

Beavers and chainsaws

The Canadian Television Trends blog posted this YouTube clip of Videotron’s pitch in the Quebec internet speed battle: chainsaws against a beaver.

Not terribly environmentally friendly. For 100Mbps, I hope we won’t be seeing deforestation. As I said yesterday, you need a sense of humour and thick skin when competing in Quebec.

Competition in Quebec: it’s no joke

The Quebec telecom market is getting to be fun to watch. Six weeks ago, I mentioned Videotron’s sponsorship of the Just For Laughs festival. Now Bell has partnered with Quebec’s most visited French-language site – tetesaclaques.tv.

If you are not familiar with Têtes à Claques, you can find some on YouTube, but who knows what the status is of that intellectual property. Better to visit the official tetesaclaques.tv website.

Têtes à Claques fans will have unlimited access to clips by subscribing to Bell’s Fun bundle, starting at $20 a month. Exclusive content like voicetones, caller ring tunes, video ringtones and screensavers will be updated each week.

A lot of companies have approached the Quebec consumer market by simply translating their English language ads into French and then sat wondering why the customers didn’t respond. Both Videotron and Bell have turned up the heat with a battle of humour.

With a quarter of Canada’s population at stake, the Quebec market is no laughing matter.

Canadians and Super Bowl commercials

Why can’t Canadians watch those multi-million dollar US Super Bowl commercials?

The CRTC has published its annual explanation on its website.

So why are Canadian commercials substituted on the US channels?

When broadcasters buy programs from American and Canadian producers or networks, they pay for exclusive distribution rights in their home markets. The simultaneous substitution regulation, set out in the CRTC’s Cable Regulations, is designed to protect those rights.

It comes down to protecting the Canadian rights holders.

Why are Superbowl commercials so entertaining? Ad time is running $2.6M for 30 seconds this year. At that price, many of the commercials will have been specially prepared just for this one insertion, hoping to keep your attention so you don’t choose to be flushing at the time.

Cutting off sex-offenders email

The US is considering a sex-offender email registry system, in what appears to be a scheme to make law-makers feel good and protect bigger websites from litigation.

Sex offenders to register their e-mail and instant messaging addresses with law enforcement authorities. The legislation would see the Justice Department develop a system that allows social networking sites to check members’ addresses against individuals listed in the National Sex Offender Registry.

Violators who fail to comply with registering their online communication identities would face up to 10 years in prison under the bill. If the offender was on supervised release from prison, the individual’s probation would be revoked.

I have a number of concerns about this. It helps with convicted sex-offenders who are captured under this legislation, but does nothing for those who have never been caught. Since it is so easy for these offenders to acquire a new email address, the law doesn’t seem to be as effective as preventing problems as it may be to add to charges if a convicted offender is caught using an unregistered email address.

The proposal may have the support of MySpace and Facebook, but consider this proposal in the context of litigation. According to the Reuters story,

Sex offender data is currently collected by individual state authorities. MySpace and background verification company Sentinel Tech Holdings Corp. developed a technology that combines those registries to help police track some 600,000 convicted sex offenders.

MySpace is in a partnership with Sentinel.

Is anyone concerned about a barrier to entry for future social networking competitors, since new entrants will need to make use of the MySpace-Sentinel database. Does this database become a bottleneck that needs regulatory oversight? Any net neutrality concerns about this?

What will happen to sites that may not be able to access the data? What child abuse protections are there for foreign-based social networking sites?

Technorati Tags:
, , ,

Scroll to Top