A recent article on CNET reports that AT&T; is warning that the internet will hit full capacity by 2010. It is an attention grabbing headline.
Of course, there is a catch.
When you get into the body of the article you see that Jim Cicconi, vice president of legislative affairs for AT&T;, warned that at least $55 billion is needed in new infrastructure investment in the next three years in the U.S. on top of $75B needed worldwide.
Before you go running for cover, Cicconi said that AT&T; is doing its part, with plans to spend $19B on its network infrastructure. Some audience members asked if the hidden motivation behind Cicconi’s speech was AT&T;’s position on net neutrality. He responded by saying he believed government intervention in the Internet was fundamentally wrong.
There is nothing magic or ethereal about the Internet–it is no more ethereal than the highway system. It is not created by an act of God, but upgraded and maintained by private investors.
The CNET story includes a quote from the US Department of Justice that merits reproducing, especially given my post from Monday on the NDP perspectives on government interference in network management:
However well-intentioned, regulatory restraints can inefficiently skew investment, delay innovation, and diminish consumer welfare, and there is reason to believe that the kinds of broad marketplace restrictions proposed in the name of ‘neutrality’ would do just that, with respect to the Internet.
William Archer, CMO of AT&T; Business will deliver the luncheon keynote address on June 16 and Eric Loeb, AT&T;’s VP International External and Regulatory Affairs will be speaking on Network Neutrality at The 2008 Canadian Telecom Summit on June 18.
Have you registered yet?