In late January, I noted that we have been waiting for months for Canada’s Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage (CHPC) to follow-up on its October resolution: “That the officials from the Department of Canadian Heritage that were responsible for the funding of Laith Marouf be invited to appear before committee regarding the federal funding provided to the Community Media Advocacy Centre by the Department of Canadian Heritage and the Department officials’ handling of the situation”.
That day of reckoning finally took place on Monday (February 13). You can watch the entire 90-minute meeting on ParlVU. Using my November 1 blog post as a basis (What I Would Say At Heritage Committee), I submitted a brief to members of the Committee which had been distributed to them a few months ago. It is available on the CHPC website.
Michael Geist wrote a piece that I commend to you: “Apologies Without Accountability: Canadian Heritage Committee Seeks Answers on Government Funding an Anti-Semite”. Marie Woolf continued her strong coverage of the Laith Marouf affair in the Globe and Mail in a story headlined “Ottawa hires debt collectors to get grant back from Laith Marouf employer”.
To those who are critical of the government hiring outside debt-collectors, I observed on Twitter that the point isn’t to get money into the government treasury; it is to get the government money out of the hands of antisemites.
The point of using debt-collectors isn't to get $100,000 back into government coffers. It is to get it out of an antisemite's bank account.
Frankly, we shouldn't care if it costs tens of millions to claw back the money.
Antisemites don't get to benefit from government funding. https://t.co/ddle8wRilb
— Mark Goldberg (@Mark_Goldberg) February 15, 2023
Yesterday, I put together a 6-part Twitter thread capturing some of my thoughts.
I have reproduced them here, with some concluding thoughts at the end.
My emotions have been simmering since Monday's #CHPC meeting with @CDNHeritage officials reviewing their inaction on the #LaithMarouf affair
Here are some thoughts
Let's start with the opening remarks and yet another apology without accountability:https://t.co/XtOl3xNHE9
1/6
— Mark Goldberg (@Mark_Goldberg) February 15, 2023
The opening remarks by @CdnHeritage ADM @MKhannam1 includes a disturbing timeline. She says she was notified by phone July 26, email August 2 by Minister's office. But Minister's office had info July 19 (from @AHousefather).https://t.co/puGb0aFrTY#LaithMarouf
2/6— Mark Goldberg (@Mark_Goldberg) February 15, 2023
It took two weeks for @HonAhmedHussen's Chief of Staff, Hursh Jaswal to forward @AHousefather's repeated notifications about #LaithMarouf to @CdnHeritage ADM @MKhannam1: https://t.co/xcYAP1Nzec
This is truly outrageous and inexcusable
3/6
— Mark Goldberg (@Mark_Goldberg) February 15, 2023
.@MKhannam1 told @MelissaLantsman 100 people in @CdnHeritage Comms all failed to act on the many tagged tweets last April, and skipped over my blog posts in their media scans.https://t.co/VU5TH7SEmN
Would such inaction be tolerated if it impacted any other minority group?
4/6
— Mark Goldberg (@Mark_Goldberg) February 15, 2023
What goes beyond the pale is that this department, more than ANY other department, should have been sensitive to funding #LaithMarouf antisemitism.@HonAhmedHussen is Minister of Diversity and Inclusion@MKhannam1 is Assoc. Deputy Minister
The Anti Racism Action Program!
5/6
— Mark Goldberg (@Mark_Goldberg) February 15, 2023
.@MGeist writes: "These failures will not be fixed by better approval processes and require more than just apologies. They require accountability."https://t.co/t8F1S5siBV
I'm disappointed. I'm angry. And more than anything, I'm sad this is the state of affairs in Canada
6/6
— Mark Goldberg (@Mark_Goldberg) February 15, 2023
Just before Monday’s CHPC meeting, the Globe and Mail broke the news that “Laith Marouf once barred from re-entering Canada, interviewed by CSIS”. That raises the question of how a foreign national that was barred from entering Canada in 2009 was able to obtain Canadian citizenship. I suppose that is a question for a different Parliamentary Committee to review at another time. I doubt that Canadians will emerge satisfied from that inquiry, if it ever takes place.
More than 6 months have passed since the Minister was advised of the issue by a sitting member of his own party; nearly a year has passed since the grant was awarded with the Minister appearing in a joint press release with Laith Marouf. Yet, not a single person has been held to account for failures by our government – indeed, these are failures by the very department that is charged with responsibility for developing and implementing an Anti Racism Strategy.
Was it ineptitude or indifference that motivated the inaction by officials at the senior-most levels of the Canadian Government when confronted with evidence of antisemitism by a recipient of Heritage Canada Anti Racism funding? There was inexcusable lethargy in the response that remains unexplained. A number of commentators have observed that antisemitism seems to be treated differently from other forms of hate. “Slander, insult and actual hate against Jews gets a pass — until some truly extreme example calls attention to it. Try referencing any ‘marginalized’ group as ‘bags of feces’ and see how long any journalist, politician or ordinary citizen would last.”
As I wrote on Twitter, “I’m disappointed. I’m angry. And more than anything, I’m sad this is the state of affairs in Canada.”